Re: cache directory is not removed

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: Sam Steingold <address@hidden> Date: 06 Jun 2002 11:26:02 -0400
>> 
>> I could never understand why autoconf was written in m4 in the
>> first place. this is not a troll, I would really appreciate a
>> clarification.

Read the doc!

>> perl or, better yet, clisp (http://clisp.cons.org) appear to be
>> more reasonable choices for just about any task.

Paul> Well, partly it's because Autoconf was written before Perl or
Paul> clisp were stable enough.

Paul> But even if the choice were made now, it's not clear to me that
Paul> m4 would be a bad choice for Autoconf per se.  

100% agreed.  I would still chose M4.