[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:45:04 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Guido Draheim wrote:
> In fact, it does not quite matter since bringing the software to a new
> platform may in fact lead to yet another round of `portability fixes`,
actually the reports that I recall are for _old_ platforms, such as AIX
which were not retested before release. That's 2.57. An earlier release
did not work on Solaris, as you may recall. Simply running the self-check
on one's personal computer doesn't really count for pre-release testing...
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- Re: checking for non-standard headers, (continued)
- Re: checking for non-standard headers, Braden McDaniel, 2003/08/11
- Re: checking for non-standard headers, Guido Draheim, 2003/08/11
- Message not available
- Re: checking for non-standard headers, Guido Draheim, 2003/08/12
- Re: checking for non-standard headers, Thomas Dickey, 2003/08/12
- re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers, Guido Draheim, 2003/08/12
- re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/08/12
- Re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers, Guido Draheim, 2003/08/12
- Re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/08/12
- Re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers, Guido Draheim, 2003/08/13
- Re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers,
Thomas E. Dickey <=
- Re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers, Russ Allbery, 2003/08/12
- Re: new vs old autoconf / Re: checking for non-standard headers, Akim Demaille, 2003/08/25