[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Extremely confusing behaviour... (Suspectcompiler?,op
From: |
Ralph Mason |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Extremely confusing behaviour... (Suspectcompiler?,optimization error?) |
Date: |
Thu, 15 May 2003 07:12:19 +1200 |
Unless the avr GCC documentation is incorrect, R18 & R19 are definitely call
used registers, and so are not preserved across the call.
It really doesn't matter what that function does, the fact it makes a call
and then uses r18 & r19 uninitalised is the problem.
Pretty scary bug.
Ralph
>
> It looks like the compiler assumes R18 & R19 are preserved across
> the call. Isn't that
> a bug? Gotta look at the assembly for srf08_read() to see what
> it does with those
> registers.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Panetta" <address@hidden>
> ...
> > retval = srf08_read(1, 0, pingdata, 2);
> > 1fe: 65 e0 ldi r22, 0x05 ; 5
> > 200: c6 2e mov r12, r22
> > 202: d1 2c mov r13, r1
> > 204: cc 0e add r12, r28
> > 206: dd 1e adc r13, r29
> > 208: 02 e0 ldi r16, 0x02 ; 2
> > 20a: 10 e0 ldi r17, 0x00 ; 0
> > 20c: 20 e0 ldi r18, 0x00 ; 0
> > 20e: 30 e0 ldi r19, 0x00 ; 0
> > 210: a6 01 movw r20, r12
> > 212: 60 e0 ldi r22, 0x00 ; 0
> > 214: 81 e0 ldi r24, 0x01 ; 1
> > 216: 0e 94 9c 04 call 0x938
> > PORTA &= ~(_BV(PA1));
> > 21a: d9 98 cbi 0x1b, 1 ; 27
> > PORTB = retval;
> > 21c: 68 bb out 0x18, r22 ; 24
> > } while (retval != 2);
> > 21e: 60 17 cp r22, r16
> > 220: 71 07 cpc r23, r17
> > 222: 82 07 cpc r24, r18
> > 224: 93 07 cpc r25, r19
> > 226: 71 f6 brne .-100 ; 0x1c4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.480 / Virus Database: 276 - Release Date: 12/05/2003
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.480 / Virus Database: 276 - Release Date: 12/05/2003
- [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour..., Mike Panetta, 2003/05/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour..., Keith Gudger, 2003/05/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Joerg Wunsch, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Keith Gudger, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspectcompiler?, optimization error?), Larry Barello, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspectcompiler?, optimization error?), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Extremely confusing behaviour... (Suspectcompiler?,optimization error?),
Ralph Mason <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Joerg Wunsch, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailed explanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailedexplanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), Larry Barello, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailedexplanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailed explanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), E. Weddington, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailed explanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailedexplanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), David Brown, 2003/05/16
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), E. Weddington, 2003/05/14