RE: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly

[Douglas Dotson]

Do you mean the internal reference or the reference
that is selected with the MUX4:0 bits set to 11110?
I don't see any specs on the accuracy of that voltage.
I'm not using the internal 2.56v reference due to the
inaccuracy. I'm using a precision 2.5v external
reference that appears to be stable to within a couple
of millivolts.

I understand what you are saying about thermal
equilibrium. But in this case just tapping the reset
button wouldn't be cause for the thermal equalibrium
to
be upset. Also, the beast has been setting here for
several hours and hasn't drifted a bit from the
expected value. Go figure :)

Doug

--- Loveny Design <address@hidden> wrote:
> The value 477 is approx 5% low, which is within spec
> for the internal
> reference. I think your expectations for the ADC are
> an order of magnitude
> too high ;-)
> 
> As for your other problem, it is usual for analogue
> circuits to be given a
> few seconds (or even minutes) to reach thermal
> equilibrium... which is
> possibly the cause of that observation.
> 
> Regards,
> Jon
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of
> Douglas Dotson
> > Sent: Monday, 16 February 2004 8:03 AM
> > To: Douglas Dotson; Richard Urwin;
> address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly
> >
> >
> > Things just got even stranger. I measured the
> > 1.22v internal reference on channel 31. Measures
> > low by 22 counts. Reads 477, should be 499. I'm
> > starting to question the usefullness of this ADC
> > as 10 bits.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list