Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex

[Ralf Angeli]

* Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-02) writes:

> I'm using Biblatex instead of Bibtex, for which AucTex/RefTex seems to
> be preconfigured. The basic functions like inserting citations,
> bibliographies and so on work quite well. But there's some very strange
> behavior when i use the folowing lines in my .emacs
> (setq reftex-cite-format "\\footcite[]{%l}")
> (setq reftex-cite-prompt-optional-args t),
> all i do get is "reftex-do-citation: Args out of range: 21, 37"(I think
> the numbers change from time to time...). The expected behaviour would
> be to insert the optional argument(which follows the citation, ie. a
> page number) after the citation.

Does it work with the latest released version of RefTeX (available from
its home page) or even a CVS checkout?  (You might have to wait a bit
for the RefTeX repository to become available again after the Savannah
outage.)

-- 
Ralf