Re: plug-in parser's output

[Shigio Yamaguchi]

> gtags can't handle plug-in parser's output like this.
> 
> === Emacs ctags === 
> Bob::operator new  28 ./testsuite/20_util/memory/allocator/10378.cc   static 
void* operator new(
> 
> === Exuberant ctags ===
> operator unsigned long function     49 ./testsuite/27_io/basic_filebuf/seekof
f/10132-2.cc operator unsigned long() const { return character; }
> 
> Should we improve gtags.conf? Or should we give up?

How about ignoring such lines in the script defined in gtags.conf?

But I feel the doubt in keep the support of plug-in parser.
Isn't it better to make better built-in parsers?
What do you think?
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3