Re: plug-in parser's output

[Shigio Yamaguchi]

> However, I don't consider it worthless that ctags and etags
> can be used as parser. 

Right. It's a trade-off.

> How about adding a converter from `tags' or `TAGS' to `GTAGS'
> as alternative of the command layer plug-in?

Though it is not a bad idea, depending on external commands brings
a lot of annoyingness.
Do you think both the plug-in parser and the converter are needed?
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3