[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: plug-in parser's output
From: |
Hideki IWAMOTO |
Subject: |
Re: plug-in parser's output |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:08:01 +0900 |
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:17:54 +0900, Shigio Yamaguchi wrote...
> > This is revised version.
> > This version is as fast as plug-in parser.
>
> I wonder who will need this function.
> o The --ctags2gtags option is not so fast than without the option.
This is not for improving speed.
> o The --ctags2gtags option cannot support GRTAGS and GSYMS.
It is the same as the present plug-in parser.
> o If tag file exists, it is likely that tag command also exists.
You are going to remove support of plug-in parser soon.
> o Gtags must understand tags format in addition to ctags -x format.
After the interface of gtags-parser is changed into function call,
ctags -x format is no longer supported.
>
> What is the purpsoe of this function?
It becomes an alternative after plug-in parser's support is removed.
It is inferior to the plug-in parser at the point which cannot be updated
incremental.
----
Hideki IWAMOTO address@hidden
- Re: plug-in parser's output, (continued)
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/07
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/07
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/18
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/18
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/19
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/20
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/20
- Re: plug-in parser's output,
Hideki IWAMOTO <=
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/20
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/20