Re: plug-in parser's output

[Shigio Yamaguchi]

> > What is the purpsoe of this function?
> 
> It becomes an alternative after plug-in parser's support is removed.

I won't remove plug-in parser.
My expression might have been confusing.

=> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
=> To: Hideki IWAMOTO <address@hidden>
=> cc: Shigio Yamaguchi <address@hidden>, address@hidden
=> Subject: Re: plug-in parser's output
=> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:03:28 +0900
=> From: Shigio Yamaguchi <address@hidden>
=> 
=> > No. I am talking about the converter on the assumption that support
=> > of plug-in parser is stopped.
=> 
=> I see.
=> Let's leave plug-in parser, even if we move to built-in parser.

To avoid misunderstanding, I restates as follows:
Let's keep supporting plug-in parser in the future, even if we move
to built-in parser.
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3