Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compile: Solaris 9

[Holger]

At 23:25 08.08.2003 +0200, Jim Segrave wrote:
> On Fri 08 Aug 2003 (22:54 +0200), Holger wrote:
> > ld: Software Generation Utilities - Solaris Link Editors: 5.9-1.376
> > Undefined                       first referenced
> >  symbol                             in file
> > XFlush                              gnubg.o  (symbol belongs to implicit
> > dependency /usr/lib/libX11.so.4)
> > XEventsQueued                       gnubg.o  (symbol belongs to implicit
> > dependency /usr/lib/libX11.so.4)
> > ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to gnubg
>
> As you note later, there's no X11 libraries being pulled in, so this
> isn't surprising. I wonder how configure got through its tests without
> getting similar errors.

This and why pkg-config doesn't give -lX11 for gtk2.

> > >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./lib  -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I./intl
> > >> -DLOCALEDIR=\"/home/pub/lib/gnubg-030807/share/locale\"
> > >> -I/usr/KDE/3.1/include
> > >> -I/usr/KDE/3.1/include/freetype2  -I/usr/python/include/python2.2
> > >> -I/home/pub/lib/gtk+-1.2.10/include/gtk-1.2 -I/home/pub/lib/glib-
> > >> 1.2.10/include/glib-1.2 -I/home/pub/lib/glib-1.2.10/lib/glib/include
> > >> -I/usr/openwin/include  -I/home/pub/include    -g -O2 -c `test -f
> > >> 'gtkoptions.c' || echo './'`gtkoptions.c
>
> This is a totally different compiler invocation, this time asking for
> gtk-1.2.

> I'm very confused. Some of these compiles are running gcc with gtk-2

Sorry for confusing you. As I wrote I have both tried with gtk-2 and then 
1.2 in order to see if this would work. So yes, you are right, that these 
are different outputs. Please note that I wrote this in different mails.

> paths, some with gtk-1.2 paths. When you re-ran configure to change
> from one version of gtk to the other, did you do a 'make clean'? I

Yes. Probably even deleted everything and started from scratch. I've tried 
lots of times.

> would have expected everything to be rebuilt because of the changes to
> config.h, but if there are files that don't include it, the .o files
> might not be rebuilt and you would see this gtk-2/gtk-1.2 conflict.

No, it's not this.

> > If I edit Makefile after configure and add:
> > gnubg_LDFLAGS = -lX11
> > it links without problems.
> >
> > I'm not sure if Makefile.am should be changed since it seems to be just
> > this system. What is the best option to set it up? Just setting
> > LDFLAGS=-X11 before configure?
>
> I'd do that.
>
> % export LDFLAGS=-X11
> % ./configure 2>&1 | tee configure.out
> % make clean
> % make 2>&1 | tee make.out

Tried it already before and it works. :)

> I think I'd recommend setting LDFLAGS, doing a configure for gtk-2,
> doing a make clean and see what happens. I'm almost sure that you have
> a mixture of .o files built from Makefiles with different configure
> options.

From gnubg? No, see above. I just don't know why pkg-config omits -lX11.

Thanks a lot, Jim.

Regards,

        Holger