Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compile: Solaris 9

[Holger]

At 23:58 07.08.2003 +0200, Jim Segrave wrote:
> On Thu 07 Aug 2003 (23:34 +0200), Holger wrote:
> > So I suppose it's a similar output like on your machine. However, please
> > note those '-X11-' with GTK+ 2. Can someone confirm that this is ok?
>
> What does
>
> locate | grep libgtk

> locate libgtk           # (locate requires a parameter here)
Lots... in home and ftp directories only
The only sensible location is however:
/home/pub/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0
/home/pub/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.0
/home/pub/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1
/home/pub/lib/libgtk.a
/home/pub/lib/libgtk.la
/home/pub/lib/libgtk.so
Nothing gtk2-related. If you really want I can send you the output.

find in $LD_LIBRARY_PATH` for '*libgtk*' gives among others this:
/usr/local/lib/netscape/6.2.3/dist/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0
/usr/local/lib/netscape/6.2.3/dist/lib/libgtk.so
/usr/local/lib/netscape/6.2.3/dist/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.100.0
/home/pub/lib/gtk+-1.2.10/lib/libgtk.so
/home/pub/lib/gtk+-1.2.10/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1
/home/pub/lib/gtk+-1.2.10/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0
/home/pub/lib/gtk+-1.2.10/lib/libgtk.la
/home/pub/lib/gtk+-1.2.10/lib/libgtk.a
/home/pub/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0
/home/pub/lib/libgtk.so

> give? I've got some libraries (FreeBSD and Linux) which have things
> like this, including libgtk which is actually
>
> /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so
>
> on Linux (<unix geek>side rant - what mindless idiot decided that Linux didn't
> need to use /usr/local? Can they be sent to Redmond for a visit when
> the earthquake comes?</unix geek>)

:-)

> > I've also tried to compile with GTK+ 1.2 (--without-gtk2). But then gnubg
> > restricts itself to glib 1.2 as well and has problems with linking. Hmm,
> > but then why did it find the definitions of the glib2 calls in the first
> > place?
>
> speculation - the Solaris install hasn't managed to keep the gtk1.2 and gtk2.0
> includes separated.

gtk1 includes are directly located under /usr/include/gtk and gtk2 includes 
under /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk. But with the following gcc shouldn't find 
anything of gtk2. C_INCLUDE_PATH is not set.

source='gtkoptions.c' object='gtkoptions.o' libtool=no \
depfile='.deps/gtkoptions.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/gtkoptions.TPo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/bash ./depcomp \
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./lib  -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I./intl 
-DLOCALEDIR=\"/home/pub/lib/gnubg-030807/share/locale\" 
-I/usr/KDE/3.1/include 
-I/usr/KDE/3.1/include/freetype2  -I/usr/python/include/python2.2 
-I/home/pub/lib/gtk+-1.2.10/include/gtk-1.2 -I/home/pub/lib/glib-
1.2.10/include/glib-1.2 -I/home/pub/lib/glib-1.2.10/lib/glib/include 
-I/usr/openwin/include  -I/home/pub/include    -g -O2 -c `test -f 
'gtkoptions.c' || echo './'`gtkoptions.c


> > gcc  -g -O2   -o gnubg  gnubg.o getopt.o getopt1.o eval.o play.o
(snip)
> > gtktempmap.o gtkbearoff.o gtkoptions.o gtkpath.o gtktoolbar.o   luxi.o
> > gnubgmodule.o -L/home/pub/lib/gtk+-1.2.10/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib
> > -R/usr/openwin/lib -lgtk -lgdk -L/home/pub/lib/glib-1.2.10/lib -lgmodule
> > -lglib -ldl -lXext -lX11 -lsocket -lnsl -lm -Llib 
> -levent  ./intl/libintl.a
> > -liconv -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lm -lsocket -lnsl -L/usr/KDE/3.1/lib
> > -lfreetype  -lsocket -lnsl -ldl  -lpthread -lthread
> > /usr/python/lib/python2.2/config/libpython2.2.a   -lpng -lz 
> -L/home/pub/lib
> > -lart_lgpl -lm  -lpng -lresolv -lnsl -lsocket -ldl -lgdbm -lreadline
> > -ltermcap -lm
> > Undefined                       first referenced
> >  symbol                             in file
> > g_type_check_instance_is_a          gtk-multiview.o
> > g_type_check_instance_cast          gtk-multiview.o
> >
> > I'm out of business here. :(
>
> It may be a package installation problem - perhaps someone building
> the package for gtk didn't arrange for different include directories

Should I really need to try to build gtk2 myself? Doesn't seem overly easy.

> for differnt versons. I only see the above declared in gtk-2 includes

Yes, that's (also) why I wrote the mail. I think it's a bug and maybe 
better leave it to someone else. I'm not that sure what to replace it with.

Thanks and regards,

        Holger