Re: any interest in Rational Range Interpretation?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 12/08/2011 07:56 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/06/11 12:25, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> > The silence in reaction was deafening.
>
> Actually, the silence is encouraging;
> it means nobody is objecting to it even though
> they've had a week or so to think about it.

I don't think any of the problems have (unfortunately) been fixed, 
indeed they aren't fixable: you have to choose between sane ranges and 
working collating symbols/equivalence classes.

This is not entirely negative: the patches are okay with me, but they 
will only have an effect as long as distributors use --with-included-regex.

Paolo