Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw

[Michele La Monaca]

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:

> Chicken uses the local C's idea of number-to-string conversion.

Not the best approach I think. I would rather prefer a consistent behavior.

> Since "1." is a valid Scheme inexact number, that's perfectly fine.

Being a valid Scheme number it's not a valid reason to dislay it as it is, IMHO.

Michele