[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:37:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Moritz Heidkamp scripsit:
> That's not quite right, is it? E.g. it is not possible to multiplex
> across mailboxes (as with Go's select statement) or limit their size (at
> least not out of the box). Those are quite essential provisions for
> programming in a CSP style, at least to my (so far fairly incomplete)
> understanding.
Quite right, though I don't consider either point essential. Limited
mailboxes are useful to prevent livelock (though at the risk of deadlock),
and perhaps they should be retrofitted into the egg.
--
"The serene chaos that is Courage, and the phenomenon address@hidden
of Unopened Consciousness have been known to the John Cowan
Great World eons longer than Extaboulism."
"Why is that?" the woman inquired.
"Because I just made that word up", the Master said wisely.
--Kehlog Albran, The Profit http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
- [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, mfv, 2013/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, mfv, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, mfv, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Hugo Arregui, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Daniel Leslie, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/11/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Daniel Leslie, 2013/11/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Peter Bex, 2013/11/28