[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why gcj? WAS: Re: Benchmarks (who has the fastest free VM)
|
From: |
Jeff Sturm |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why gcj? WAS: Re: Benchmarks (who has the fastest free VM) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 00:35:19 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> bytecode is portable, but native objects are fast. So ideally, you'd use
> bytecode for distribution, and use native compilation for local deployment.
Compiling from source is really the ideal situation, but yes,
bytecode->object works.
Also gcj-compiled applications may yield a smaller memory footprint.
Jeff
Re: Benchmarks (who has the fastest free VM), Mark Wielaard, 2003/07/08
Re: Benchmarks (who has the fastest free VM), Dalibor Topic, 2003/07/08
Re: Benchmarks (who has the fastest free VM), David P Grove, 2003/07/08