[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this approach Valid
From: |
Casey Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: Is this approach Valid |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:34:19 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Burdess <address@hidden> writes:
Chris> Adam Young wrote:
>> Hi, I'm the guys that joined recently and claimed he woulld
>> implmenet the javax.security.auth packages.
Chris> GNU Crypto (http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-crypto/) has
Chris> already implemented the javax.security.auth.callback and
Chris> javax.security.sasl packages. It might be an idea to make sure
Chris> nobody in that project is currently working on
Chris> javax.security.auth, to avoid duplication.
Nope, we aren't. I have a start on the JGSS API (org.ietf.jgss) that
is somewhat related, but probably won't be working on
javax.security.auth anytime soon.
Of course, I'd recommend using GNU Crypto's
javax.security.auth.callback implementation, so there is at least no
duplication there.
- --
Casey Marshall || address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFAU5ppgAuWMgRGsWsRAu5FAJ49pWBDMH/JfByIDSurBoPt+7gMaQCfdqxN
amvMEr0or9OquRgCeaZoFWw=
=EJ3M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 0.08 NEWS, Dalibor Topic, 2004/03/10