Re: [Denemo-devel] The 0.8.12 release

[alex stone]

Richard, I'm about to update (after a spot of dinner), and i'll try
again, using just port names.

Alex.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 16:19 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 15:19 +0000, alex stone wrote:
>> > Device and port creation is ok, as long as the user remembers that
>> > each port must have a number too. Simply giving a port a name didn't
>> > work.
>> why not? That is: what happens that shouldn't?
>> I am not aware of any interpretation of the names remaining in the code,
>> but there may be something in there still.
>
> To be specific: I just started denemo with a denemorc starting thus:
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <Denemo>
>  <Config>
>    <midi-devices>
>      <device client="denemome">
>        <ports>
>          <port>midi_outa</port>
>          <port>midi_outb</port>
>          <port>midi_outc</port>
>        </ports>
>      </device>
>      <device client="denemoyou">
>        <ports>
>          <port>midi_outa</port>
>          <port>midi_outb</port>
>          <port>midi_outc</port>
>        </ports>
>      </device>
>    </midi-devices>
>    <lilypath>lilypond</lilypath>
>
> ... and so on
> I connected to the second of the devices and the midi_outc port, and
> gave the staff that name denemoyou->midi_outc and fluidsynth received
> the play data.
> I don't think you need numbers in there - I am generating names with
> numbers if you create a port or device, but they aren't needed.
>
> Richard
>
>
>



-- 
www.openoctave.org

address@hidden
address@hidden