Re: Compiling GNUstep on darwin (again)

[Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf]

>On Wednesday, Jul 24, 2002, at 12:36PM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf 
<Lars.Sonchocky-Helldorf@bbdo-interone.de> wrote:
>
>>>The NeXT (Apple) runtime is written with asemmbly while GNU's is 
>>>written in pure C code (so it is more portable).
>>
>>Are you really shure about this? A while ago I checked out Apple's objc4 

>>projekt from anoncvs.opensource.apple.com and build that. I don't 
remember any assembler files there (but I also 
>>didn't inspect every line of code). currently I can't check (since I am 
at 
>>work but I will as soon as I get home).
>>
>>>
>
>shure?

Oops, typo. I did not mean the microphone maker, I meant "sure".

>
>The 'runtime' is written in C with optimizations in assembly. IIRC the 
manner in which the 'runtime' branches to a function can't be generalized 
in >C.

thanks for the clarification, I did not look there.

greetings, Lars