duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Duplicity best practices?


From: Ian Barton
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: Duplicity best practices?
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:34:19 +0000
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227)


I'm just trying to figure out how to use that effectively myself. Right now, my script runs the verify but always fails. I have to do additional testing and see where the problems lie, but I would think/expect that good buisness practice would require a full verify after any backup to ensure that the backup was done properly and is successful. However, I am not sure what to do if a verify fails; does one delete the most recent backup and try again?

The other thing I saw "missing" is a discussion relating to the --volsize parameter. I have given this a lot of consideration, and I get the feeling that keeping the backup in a single volume is the best method; my reasoning being that there would be less chance of finding a corrupt piece. However, I am not entirely sure about this theory and would love to hear feedback/comments about it. For my needs, I am backing up to a local NAS so I don't need to worry about slow network transfers, however, I don't know if a single volume is good for remote uploads or not. Any thoughts?

Those are my biggest points that I thought of when reading your page.

k

Thanks Eric, I'll address those points when I edit the page.

Ian.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]