[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS
From: |
Pavel Janík |
Subject: |
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Oct 2001 17:55:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1.50 |
From: address@hidden (Pavel Janík)
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 17:41:10 +0200
> I think that the main reason to do that is that some functions have long
> doc-string (>2048) and thus are twice in the sources. Once without
> doc-string and once with it. The second DEFUN is/was (I haven't looked yet)
> inside comment.
Like the definition of read-from-minibuffer and other functions:
./callint.c: DEFUN ("interactive", Finteractive, Sinteractive, 0, UNEVALLED, 0,
./editfns.c: DEFUN ("format-time-string", Fformat_time_string,
Sformat_time_string, 1, 3, 0,
./minibuf.c: DEFUN ("read-from-minibuffer", Fread_from_minibuffer,
Sread_from_minibuffer, 1, 7, 0,
./minibuf.c: DEFUN ("completing-read", Fcompleting_read, Scompleting_read, 2,
8, 0,
./syntax.c: DEFUN ("modify-syntax-entry", Fmodify_syntax_entry,
Smodify_syntax_entry, 2, 3,
./syntax.c: DEFUN ("parse-partial-sexp", Fparse_partial_sexp,
Sparse_partial_sexp, 2, 6, 0,
--
Pavel Janík
panic("bad_user_access_length executed (not cool, dude)");
-- 2.0.38 kernel/panic.c
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, (continued)
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/16
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/14
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS,
Pavel Janík <=