[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS |
Date: |
16 Oct 2001 18:28:22 +0900 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> I suspect converting the actual DEFUNS would be pretty easy, especially
> since the string->comment conversion's already been done.
Also, I should add that any actual conversion to `doc:' form can be done
file-by-file -- since it's compatible with the old-style DEFUNs,
DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS can simply be undefined in any converted files.
-Miles
--
Run away! Run away!
- DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/14
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/14
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/14
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/15
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/15
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/16
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/14