[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GTK.
From: |
William M. Perry |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GTK. |
Date: |
04 Dec 2001 10:59:31 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1.50 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> In GTK 2.0, the GDK layer has undergone a pretty thorough rewrite to
> better support other window systems. All the MS-Windows, BeOS,
> MacOS, frame-buffer, and X-Windows drawing code is isolated in GDK
> and it has been made much harder to get at the underlying
> window-system objects (like a `Display *' or a 'Window' from the GTK
> objects.
>
> Is it annoying but doable, or impossible?
Annoying, but doable and unclean. I would prefer not to see time spent on
an implementation like that when a native GTK port would not be much more
difficult (20%?). But I'll still help as much as I can, whichever way
people want to do it.
If we do a native GTK port, then you could theoretically run Emacs on a
linux tty and get all the graphical goodness, which would be very cool. :)
-bp
--
Ceterum censeo vi esse delendam
- Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/01
- Re[1]: Emacs and GTK., Eric M. Ludlam, 2001/12/01
- Re: Re[1]: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/01
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/02
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/02
- Re: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/02
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: Emacs and GTK.,
William M. Perry <=
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/04
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jason Rumney, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/06
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/07
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Alex Schroeder, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/06