[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should invisible imply intangible?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Should invisible imply intangible? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 23:39:53 -0700 (MST) |
Well, I already explained that in the case of an overlay, the display
property is not really connected with the text but with the buffer
locations.
You've stated your views, but I don't agree.
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, (continued)
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/05
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/09
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/09
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/11
- Message not available
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/11
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/12
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/13
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, David Kastrup, 2002/03/13
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/14
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, David Kastrup, 2002/03/15
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, David Kastrup, 2002/03/16
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/18
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, David Kastrup, 2002/03/18
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/19
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, David Kastrup, 2002/03/19
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/20
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/15
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Miles Bader, 2002/03/15
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/15
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, David Kastrup, 2002/03/15