[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: asymmetries and contradictions in shell navigation u
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: asymmetries and contradictions in shell navigation using C-a and C-e on a prompt line] |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:07:31 -0700 (MST) |
The reason it does this is because the minibuffer input field is at the
end of the buffer, and can have a size of zero. Thus any inserted
characters will have nil values for their properties, including the
`field' property. Also, it's important that the field code recognize
that there's an empty field there, so that commands such as C-a don't
act wierdly when nothing's been typed into the minibuffer.
However, I think this can be handled by making the minibuffer input use
an overlay for the input field, instead of relying on the nil-properties
inserted at the end of the buffer.
That part bothers me. Can we assign a coherent meaning to a field
property on an empty overlay?
Re: address@hidden: asymmetries and contradictions in shell navigation using C-a and C-e on a prompt line], Richard Stallman, 2002/03/19
Re: address@hidden: asymmetries and contradictions in shell navigation using C-a and C-e on a prompt line],
Richard Stallman <=