[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim] |
Date: |
11 Apr 2002 13:49:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 |
Francesco Potorti` <address@hidden> writes:
> To set (reactivate) the mark immedately following a series of
> C-u C-SPC C-SPC C-SPC C-SPC C-SPC commands, use C-u C-SPC (or
> C-u C-SPC C-SPC to toggle transient-mark-mode).
>
> Or even just give any other command, right?
Of course, but this makes it `self-contained'.
In any case, I don't know whether this may break other lisp
packages which calls set-mark-command. Maybe it should check
with (eq last-command 'set-mark-command) to be sure...?
>
> This is a significant deviation from the old behaviour of C-u C-SPC,
> but the new functionality is much easier to use...!
>
> Yes, I think so. Only sophisticated users know about C-u C-SPC, so
> this problem may not be serious. On the other hand, working with
> Emacses of different versions could be annoying. But overall I like
> the idea.
Revolution vs. evolution :-)
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Benjamin Rutt, 2002/04/08
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/09
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Richard Stallman, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/11
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/04/11
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim],
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/11
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Richard Stallman, 2002/04/11
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/12
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/12
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Richard Stallman, 2002/04/13
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/14
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Richard Stallman, 2002/04/16