[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: init_buffer PWD fix
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: init_buffer PWD fix |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:12:44 +0300 (IDT) |
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, MIYASHITA Hisashi wrote:
> Windows dose not have symbolic link and if the current directory
> permission dose not allow to enter, we cannot invoke any programs.
True for now. But suppose we introduce into Emacs support for
Cygwin-style symlinks some day--are we supposed to go through all the
primitives and invent Windows-specific code to handle that?
I think computing a simulated inode for a directory is much simpler, and
will work for a broader class of potential changes in the underlying
filesystem and in Emacs. The code already exists, it just needs to be
activated by removing the #if 0 conditional. I fail to understand why
are we still arguing...
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, (continued)
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/23
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24