[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:47:18 -0600 (MDT) |
I've bootstrapped HEAD on Windows and on a RedHat 7.2, I've extracted
the symbols from each (text between \x1F and \x0A), sorted the lists and
compared them. There are 193 differences.
I can see why there might be many differences between Windows and GNU|Unix.
Different makefiles are used on those two systems.
We have tried to make sure that DOC is the same on all Unix-like
systems and regardless of options used. Someone just found a bug in
that, but the fix was simple. Keeping DOC the same on these systems
is worth doing.
Making DOC be the same on Windows as on Unix-like systems is possible,
but it will be somewhat more work, and more costly in a way. Is it
important to do this? Are there users that want to share the DOC file
between Windows machines and GNU-like systems?
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., (continued)
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/14
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/15
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/06/14
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/15
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/20
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/21
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/21
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/22
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/23
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/24