Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

[Rob Browning]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> Ok.  Turns out it's very small.
>
> Indeed.  It sounds like adding fontset.o to SOME_MACHINE_OBJECTS on 
> src/Makefile.in should fix that.  Can you try?
>
> I think we also saw similar problems with the Windows port, so perhaps 
> someone who can build a Windows version could compare the DOC file with 
> the Unix version, and see whether more files are missing from the 
> respective lists in src/Makefile.in.

OK, so I'll see about applying this fix.  Given that, what would be
the most appropriate way to build the X and non-X binaries?  Should I
just go through a full clean, reconfigure, and make for each one, or
is there a more efficient approach that would still be considered
correct.

Thanks

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD