Re: reducing defface redundancy

[Kim F. Storm]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> After that discussion, my thought was that the proper way to deal with
> this is actually simple:  when the user changes some attribute, find
> out at what `level' in the defface specification the changed attribute
> came from, and apply the user's change there; for any attributes _not_
> in the original defface spec, just apply them at the `top' (root)
> level.  I think this would be very natural (probably more so than the
> current behavior, and certainly no worse).  I also think it would be
> simple to implement.
> 
> What do you think of this suggestion?

Sounds fine.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk