Re: ehelp woes, or why I hate a module that I love so much

[Simon Josefsson]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
>> But perhaps adding thread support to Emacs/elisp is easier than doing
>> the conversion from Emacs/elisp to Emacs/Guile. Who knows?
>
> I rather doubt that switching to guile will suddenly make emacs one big
> happy multi-threaded application -- I suspect the biggest effort will be
> in making various lisp applications thread-safe, not in the low-level (C
> level) thread support, so it will be incurred regardless of how threads
> are added.

Yes, and I am eager to develop patches making Gnus a threaded
application, but until Emacs has threads I can't do that.