[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 22:31:50 -0400 |
A skeleton is basically a list. Each element of the list is either a
string, a piece of lisp code, a sub-skeleton list or something to be
reinterpreted by skeleton-internal-1, basically anything that lisp
allows as a list member. The only reason a bare - would occur in an
existing skeleton is if someone was using it as a variable name for some
obscure purpoose. It is quite unlikely that any existing skeleton has
any bare -'s, the only use would be as parts of strings or character
constants using the usual lisp syntax for such.
In that case I see no harm in this change. Stephan, would you like
to install it?
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, (continued)
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/13
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/20
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/23
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/24
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/28
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/29
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/02