[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:50:28 -0400 |
The behavior I propose adds a new character whose only purpose is to
provide an alternate method to set skeleton-point without interacting
with regions at all. Therefore, the proposal I have made will set
skeleton-point to the first occurrence of either - or _ while preserving
the original semantics of both @ and _ otherwise.
It seems logical. Are there skeletons that use - that might break
with this change? (Is it meaningful to use - in a skeleton now? Is
that an error?)
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, (continued)
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/13
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/20
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/24
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/25
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/28
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/29
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/02