[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions* |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:27:48 -0500 (EST) |
To be able to remove bold properties from all used faces and to make
other transformations that fit faces into used displays, I propose
to add a new hook `custom-define-face-hook'.
I like this approach, but on testing it, I find that your patch fails
on my screen, with its 135 dpi resolutionboth for
bold properties in the buffer list and in the mode line.
This is with a 10x20 font:
-Misc-Fixed-Medium-R-Normal--20-200-75-75-C-100-ISO8859-1
The default font works fine. However, I don't use it because it is
too small for this resolution -- just as you say.
I have never been able to figure out what to do, but am using the
patch that Miles produced more than a year ago, which works fine and
does not exhibit any race conditions, which Miles worried about. (I
think the patch could be committed to CVS, but do not dare do it
myself.)
The old messages are in email entitled:
Bold by moving pixels problem
starting on 20 Nov 2002
signal handling bogosities
starting on 19 Dec 2002
The patch I am using is from
From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Bold by moving pixels problem
Date: 18 Dec 2002 19:01:01 +0900
--
Robert J. Chassell Rattlesnake Enterprises
http://www.rattlesnake.com GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.teak.cc address@hidden
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, (continued)
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/23
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/23
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/23
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Masatake YAMATO, 2004/03/23
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Miles Bader, 2004/03/24
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/24
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/24
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/24
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/03/23
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Juri Linkov, 2004/03/23
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*,
Robert J. Chassell <=
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Juri Linkov, 2004/03/25
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Juri Linkov, 2004/03/23
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, David Kastrup, 2004/03/23
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Juri Linkov, 2004/03/25
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/24
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/27
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/28