[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2004 13:54:21 -0400 |
I tested this change, and it seems to work correctly with occur,
i.e. it allows to continue visiting next occurrences from the same
occur buffer where the current source buffer was visited from,
even if it is not from the last occur/compile/grep.
If you switch to another source buffer that was last reached
through C-x ` from a compilation error, then C-x ` will get the
next compilation error, rather than the next occurrence.
At least, it sounds like your change would have that result.
I don't think that is the right behavior.
- next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/08
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/10
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13