[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
10 May 2004 22:19:59 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>> If you switch to another source buffer that was last reached
>> through C-x ` from a compilation error, then C-x ` will get the
>> next compilation error, rather than the next occurrence.
>> At least, it sounds like your change would have that result.
> Exactly. This is the most expected behavior, because the user
> associates the buffer visited through C-x ` with the compilation
> buffer from which it was visited, and will expect that next-error
> will show next compilation errors in the same source buffer.
No: I do M-x compile, visit a few error in xdisp.c.
Then an hour later, I do M-x grep, follow a hit, do a M-. which brings me
to xdisp.c, then try C-x ` to get to the next hit and !bang! I'm brought
to the next error in the compilation I completely forgot about.
The main problem with your approach is that its memory lasts too long.
Stefan
- next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/08
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/10
- Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13