[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Tue, 11 May 2004 02:35:16 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I tested this change, and it seems to work correctly with occur,
> i.e. it allows to continue visiting next occurrences from the same
> occur buffer where the current source buffer was visited from,
> even if it is not from the last occur/compile/grep.
>
> If you switch to another source buffer that was last reached
> through C-x ` from a compilation error, then C-x ` will get the
> next compilation error, rather than the next occurrence.
> At least, it sounds like your change would have that result.
Exactly. This is the most expected behavior, because the user
associates the buffer visited through C-x ` with the compilation
buffer from which it was visited, and will expect that next-error
will show next compilation errors in the same source buffer.
It seems nobody really tried yet to use two or more different
compile/grep/occur processes at the same time. Otherwise,
it would be apparent that this behavior is the most useful.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/08
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/13