[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error refactoring
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: next-error refactoring |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:52:06 -0400 |
It has a big potential to grow. I have about 40 lines uninstalled
(next-error-highlight related code), because of unresolved issues
regarding the right name of the whole framework.
Please assume that the name will not change.
Plus Dan Nicolaescu
proposed the code for next-error-follow-minor-mode (50 lines) which
should go into the same file. So even without Ted's plans to
extend it, this gives enough lines to split it into a new file.
That is still way too small for a new file to be desirable.
BTW, replace.el should be split too. All occur related functions
should be moved from replace.el into a separate file occur.el, because
they are already 460 lines.
I see no reason to split them. Please assume the files will
stay the same for now, and focus on issues of how to change the code.
occur has been in replace.el since the file was first written, along
with the commands how-many, keep-lines, and flush-lines, which it
is traditionally grouped with.
Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/02