Re: Should killing a help or compile buffer also delete the window?

[Daniel Brockman]

David Reitter <address@hidden> writes:

> Daniel Brockman <daniel <at> brockman.se> writes:

I just thought I'd point out that substituting `<at>' for `@' in the
body of a message is counter-effective against harvesting, since this
makes the address slip through [1,2] the filter for the archive web
interface which ordinarily removes all addresses completely (replacing
them with `<address@hidden>' or somesuch).  Of course, if someone has
a copy of the actual message, they can just look in the CC header to
find the address in plaintext.

-- 
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden>

[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-04/msg00893.html
[2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-04/msg00476.html