[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks. |
Date: |
Tue, 31 May 2005 00:17:46 -0400 |
> Gnus should define a function called gnus-run-mode-hooks, which calls
> run-mode-hooks if that is defined, otherwise run-hooks. Then all the
> modes in Gnus could use gnus-run-mode-hooks.
I've done it in the Gnus trunk and the v5-10 branch.
Thank you.
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., (continued)
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/27
- RE: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Drew Adams, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Miles Bader, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/30
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/28