[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-f RET change
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-f RET change |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:57:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Drew Adams" <address@hidden> writes:
> > > I use pop-up-frames = t. Each buffer is in its own frame, by
> > > default. So, I use `C-x 4 f' to open the same file in another
> > > frame (cloning the frame, in effect).
> >
> > What's wrong with `C-x 5 2'?
> >
> > Nothing. Good point.
> >
> > I guess I never think of the `C-x 5' prefix, because I use
> > pop-up-frames = t. `C-x 4' generally does the same thing as
> > `C-x 5' in that case, except for a few exceptions like this
> > (there is no `C-x 4 2').
>
> There is C-x 2 though.
>
> I guess I miss your point. Even with pop-up-frames = t, `C-x 2' does not
> open the file in a separate frame (and it shouldn't).
Then we probably should have a separate C-x 4 2 for symmetry that
obeys the setting of pop-up-frames.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: C-x C-f RET change, (continued)
- RE: C-x C-f RET change, Drew Adams, 2005/11/09
- Re: C-x C-f RET change, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/09
- Re: C-x C-f RET change, David Kastrup, 2005/11/10
- RE: C-x C-f RET change, Drew Adams, 2005/11/10
- Re: C-x C-f RET change, Andreas Schwab, 2005/11/10
- RE: C-x C-f RET change, Drew Adams, 2005/11/10
- Re: C-x C-f RET change, David Kastrup, 2005/11/10
- RE: C-x C-f RET change, Drew Adams, 2005/11/10
- Re: C-x C-f RET change,
David Kastrup <=
- RE: C-x C-f RET change, Drew Adams, 2005/11/10
- Re: C-x C-f RET change, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/11
- RE: C-x C-f RET change, Drew Adams, 2005/11/11
Re: C-x C-f RET change, Edward O'Connor, 2005/11/09
Re: C-x C-f RET change, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/09