[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright years
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright years |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:21:51 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:02:59 +0900
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> On 2/9/06, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Yes--just add ", 2006" to each and every file's copyright notice.
> >
> > Why is this required? I thought the rules said to only do that for
> > files on which we actually worked in the year 2006. Suppose there's a
> > file that wasn't touched in years--why should we pretend that we did
> > something there in the year 2006?
>
> Well by adding the ", 2006", the file has been touched -- and it's 2006... :-)
Right, why in the world didn't I think about it? Thanks!!
- Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/05
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11