[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging multitty
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Merging multitty |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2007 18:45:44 +0900 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Comments, better ideas?
It might be better to merge into the arch version of the trunk, and then
let that be committed to CVS. The multi-tty is already in arch, so
merging back into the arch-trunk should be basically trivial, and using
the regular arch->CVS gateway is probably safer than doing a one-off.
-Miles
--
`Suppose Korea goes to the World Cup final against Japan and wins,' Moon said.
`All the past could be forgiven.' [NYT]
- Re: Merging multitty, (continued)
- merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/11
- RE: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/14
- Re: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, David Kastrup, 2007/05/14
- RE: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/14
- Re: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, David Kastrup, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Merging multitty, David Kastrup, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/12
- Re: Merging multitty, Nick Roberts, 2007/05/12
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/12
- Re: Merging multitty, Nick Roberts, 2007/05/13
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/13
- Re: Merging multitty, Karoly Lorentey, 2007/05/13
- Re: Merging multitty, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/14