Re: Ediff regression

[Michael Kifer]

I am not sure what does ediff have to do with patch file highlighting, but
this patch indeed broke something in ediff itself. I fixed that just now.

> Something in the following checkin broke patch highlighting:
> 
> 2007-06-12  Michael Kifer  <address@hidden>
>       
>       * ediff-mult.el
>       (ediff-meta-buffer-brief-message,ediff-meta-buffer-verbose-message):
>       new variables.
>       (ediff-meta-buffer-message): variable deleted.
>       (ediff-verbose-help-enabled): new variable.
>       (ediff-toggle-verbose-help-meta-buffer): new function.
>       (ediff-redraw-directory-group-buffer): made aware of short/verbose
>       message options
>       
>       * ediff-ptch.el (ediff-context-diff-label-regexp): better regexp.
>       (ediff-fixup-patch-map): improved heuristic.
> 
> To see this, save the following diff to a file foo.patch and open it.
> The body of the patch will be highlighted as though it were a header.
> The problem did not exist before the checkin.
> 
> diff -c configure.in.\~1.452.\~ /home/cyd/emacs/configure.in
> *** configure.in.~1.452.~     2007-06-12 13:07:07.000000000 -0400
> --- configure.in      2007-06-13 13:20:27.000000000 -0400
> ***************
> *** 1874,1880 ****
>       case "${with_x_toolkit}" in
>         athena | lucid ) USE_X_TOOLKIT=LUCID ;;
>         motif ) USE_X_TOOLKIT=MOTIF ;;
> - dnl      open-look ) USE_X_TOOLKIT=OPEN_LOOK ;;
>         gtk ) with_gtk=yes
>   dnl Dont set this for GTK.  A lot of tests below assumes Xt when
>   dnl USE_X_TOOLKIT is set.
> --- 1874,1879 ----
>