[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:29:17 -0400 |
How about this: VC can test whether some VCS considers itself responsible
for a directory. I could change the logic to error out when no VCS
considers
itself responsible for the current directory. Would that cover your
use case?
In user terms, what would the resulting behavior be? Does it implement
Stefan's suggestion, which I believe is the right behavior?
- vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Andreas Schwab, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11