[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving to bzr?
From: |
Christian Faulhammer |
Subject: |
Re: Moving to bzr? |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:35:22 +0100 |
Hi,
dhruva <address@hidden>:
> I am updating bzr from their development branch and hence have the
> latest and greatest. When I run a 'bzr pull' on Emacs repo daily, it
> is running for >15 mins versus less than 3 mins for git. This is a
> serious usability issue. If more constructive feedback is required, I
> could profile it send the output over time and see if things are
> improving or status quo.
I do share your current observations, though I sync regularly and I
always had a ration of 1:2 (Git 1.6.0.4 to Bzr 1.10) up to now. So I
assume this is not a systematic issue but depending on the delivering
machine.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/04
- Re: Moving to bzr?, David Reitter, 2009/01/04
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/04
- Re: Moving to bzr?,
Christian Faulhammer <=
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/04
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/04
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/04
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Chetan Pandya, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/06
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Paul R, 2009/01/06
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/01/06