Re: end-of-defun is fubsr.

[Andreas Roehler]

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> 'ten Tag, Andreas!
> 
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 06:18:14PM +0100, Andreas Roehler wrote:
> 
>> I have remarked buggy/risky implementation already here
> 
>> http://www.archivum.info/address@hidden/2007-11/msg01940.html
> 
> Thanks, I hadn't seen that thread.  Quoting from it, Stefan said in
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>, Date: Mon, 26 Nov
> 2007 14:26:59 -0500:
> 
>     Rather than argue about the change itself, just give us some use
>     case where the new behavior is problematic.
> 
> We now have at least two problematic behaviours: it enforces
> inefficiencies on some major modes, e.g. CC Mode.  It is difficult to
> code bug-free (bug #2106, looping in Python mode).
> 
> I agree with Andreas here, this change should be reworked.
> 
>> Andreas Röhler
> 

Hi Stefan,

AFAIR point here is not to write new stuff, rather to
weed out useless girlands.

Don't felt my contribution welcome in 2007.  If you
wont me to strip it down to function now, please tell.

(Deleting some outgrown should not raise the
copyright/assignment question either.)


Andreas Röhler