Re: Sending attachments

[Jason Rumney]

I wrote:

   It is probably reasonable to use a type of application/octet-stream,
   disposition of attachment and have no description for simple
   attachments.
   ....
   We could have another command for attaching inline images and text
   files if that is a goal also, and such a function could ....


Miles Bader quoted:
> > > > always have a disposition of inline, and again not use description.
> > > >         
> Sure, I agree there are times when inline can be useful -- my objection
> was to the (apparent) idea of having inline be the default without
> prompting (I think _if_ people want to avoid prompting, inline is the
> wrong default).
>   


It seems you only read the last bit of what I wrote.