[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:41:47 +0100 |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> This is a murky area, but the fact that the code can only run together
> with GPLv3 code might imply that it is illegal to distribute it under
> an incompatible license, even if it's distributed separately.
Hm, then perhaps some code became illegal when GPLv3 was released and
even more will be illegal when GPLv4 is released...
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, (continued)
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Jonas Bernoulli, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, David Kastrup, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/27
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/25
Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Giorgos Keramidas, 2009/11/25