[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:21:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Also, I think mutex-unlock should throw some kind of error if the mutex
>> is owned by a different thread. What do you think of that?
> I think we should consider what will happen when the current cooperative
> threads model will be replaced and threads will run freely. In that
> case probably we will want to use pthread mutexes, not our
> implementation.
That's a good point.
Stefan "who really wishes we used higher-level abstractions
than locks, such as atomic-regions"
- Re: Concurrency, (continued)
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Daniel Colascione, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/28
- Re: Concurrency, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/29
- Re: Concurrency, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/29
- gsoc for concurrent Emacs? (was: Concurrency), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/31
- Re: Concurrency, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2010/03/28