[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:19:39 -0400 |
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Davis Herring" <address@hidden>
> Cc: David Kastrup <address@hidden>, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>,
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Reply-To: address@hidden
>
> That's just the point. <right>, as it stands, is only aware of the
> direction of the paragraph, not of the text, so it moves forward in
> logical order in an L2R paragraph even when that means moving leftward on
> the screen.
Correct.
> Eli, I believe, is proposing changing things so that
> <right>/etc. move visually in all cases (while C-f/etc. would still
> move logically in all cases).
No, I was not suggesting anything of this kind. In fact, whatever I
want the left/right arrow keys to do in the bidirectional case is
already in the repository, and works as you describe above, i.e. it is
sensitive to the paragraph direction.
Personally, I don't see much use to a mode where the arrows move
independently of the logical (i.e. reading) order of the text.
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, (continued)
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Andreas Schwab, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Davis Herring, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Uday S Reddy, 2010/06/08
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/08
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Uday S Reddy, 2010/06/08
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Miles Bader, 2010/06/08
Re: Performance, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/07
Re: Performance, Kenichi Handa, 2010/06/10